How to Reverse Engineer Malware Using Static and Dynamic Analysis
Read more about “How to Reverse Engineer Malware Using Static and Dynamic Analysis” and the most important cybersecurity news to stay up to date with
Malware analysis is a critical discipline within cybersecurity, essential for identifying threats, developing countermeasures, and fortifying defenses against malicious actors. Reverse engineering malware enables security researchers to dissect malicious code, understand its behavior, and extract actionable intelligence. Two primary methodologies in malware analysis are static analysis, which involves examining the malware’s code and structure without execution, and dynamic analysis, which entails running the malware in a controlled environment to observe its behavior.
Both approaches are complementary and often used together to obtain a comprehensive understanding of malware. This article will provide an in-depth, highly technical walkthrough of both static and dynamic analysis, covering essential tools, methodologies, and best practices.
1. Static Analysis
Static analysis is a preliminary step in reverse engineering malware. It involves analyzing a malicious binary without executing it, making it a safer approach when dealing with unknown threats. The primary goal is to extract useful information such as file attributes, embedded strings, function calls, and potential indicators of compromise (IOCs).
1.1 Basic Static Analysis
Basic static analysis aims to gather preliminary insights without requiring deep disassembly. It helps analysts quickly assess whether a file is suspicious and whether further investigation is needed.
File Type Identification
Before analyzing a sample, it is essential to determine its file type. The file
command in Linux can be used:
file malware_sample.exe
For Windows binaries, the Portable Executable (PE) file format is common. Tools such as PEStudio, Exeinfo PE, or Detect It Easy (DIE) can extract metadata about the binary, including its compiler, timestamp, and sections.
Hash Computation and Signature Matching
Computing cryptographic hashes helps to check if the sample is already known in malware databases.
sha256sum malware_sample.exe
Online repositories such as VirusTotal, Hybrid Analysis, and MalwareBazaar can be used to cross-reference hashes against known malware.
Strings Extraction
Extracting readable strings from a binary may reveal hardcoded IP addresses, domain names, or function calls.
strings malware_sample.exe | more
For more advanced string analysis, tools like BinText and Floss (FireEye Labs Obfuscated String Solver) can be used.
Examining PE Imports and Exports
The import table in a PE file lists the external libraries and functions a binary relies on. This can reveal the malware’s capabilities.
- Dependency Walker and PEview can help analyze imported DLLs.
- Functions related to
CreateProcess
,VirtualAlloc
, orWriteProcessMemory
often indicate code injection techniques.
1.2 Advanced Static Analysis
If a malware sample is packed, obfuscated, or encrypted, basic static analysis may not be sufficient. In such cases, more advanced techniques are required.
Disassembly and Decompilation
Disassembling converts machine code into human-readable assembly instructions, while decompilation attempts to reconstruct high-level source code.
- IDA Pro and Ghidra are industry-standard tools for reverse engineering.
- Radare2 is a powerful open-source alternative.
Unpacking and Obfuscation Analysis
Many malware samples use packers like UPX to evade detection. Checking for packers can be done using:
upx -d malware_sample.exe
For more advanced cases, memory dumping using x64dbg or OllyDbg is required to extract unpacked code at runtime.
Analyzing Embedded Resources
Some malware hides payloads within images or documents. Resource Hacker and Binwalk can extract embedded resources for further examination.
2. Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic analysis involves executing the malware in a controlled environment to observe its real-time behavior. This approach provides insights into network activity, file system changes, process injections, and registry modifications.
2.1 Setting Up a Safe Analysis Environment
Malware must be executed in a secure, isolated environment to prevent accidental infections.
- Virtual Machines (VMs): Use VMware or VirtualBox with a non-persistent snapshot system.
- Dedicated Malware Analysis OS: FLARE VM (Windows) and REMnux (Linux) provide essential analysis tools.
- Automated Sandboxing: Tools like Cuckoo Sandbox, Joe Sandbox, and Any.Run allow safe execution with detailed reports.
2.2 Behavioral Analysis
During execution, malware behavior is observed using various monitoring tools.
Process and Memory Analysis
- Process Explorer and Process Hacker detect suspicious processes.
- Procmon from Sysinternals tracks file system, registry, and process interactions.
- Volatility framework allows forensic analysis of memory dumps.
Registry Monitoring
Malware often modifies the Windows registry for persistence.
- Regshot captures registry snapshots before and after execution.
- Autoruns reveals malware persistence mechanisms (e.g., startup entries).
File System Activity
Tracking file modifications helps determine whether malware drops payloads.
- Procmon records file creation events.
- FakeNet-NG simulates network responses to observe C2 communications.
Network Analysis
Observing network traffic helps identify C2 server connections.
- Wireshark captures packets and inspects DNS requests.
- Fiddler analyzes HTTP traffic for suspicious domains.
2.3 Debugging and Code Execution Analysis
Debugging provides deeper insights into malware’s internal execution flow.
- x64dbg and OllyDbg allow setting breakpoints and stepping through code.
- WinDbg enables kernel-mode debugging.
- Frida or Dynamorio provides API hooking to intercept system calls.
3. Hybrid Analysis (Combining Static and Dynamic Methods)
A combination of static and dynamic techniques provides a thorough understanding of malware functionality.
- Static Analysis is used first to extract preliminary indicators and unpack code.
- Dynamic Analysis follows to observe behavior in real-time.
- Debugging and Memory Analysis uncover hidden execution logic.
4. Best Practices for Malware Analysis
- Always use isolated environments to prevent infections.
- Take system snapshots before executing malware.
- Never analyze samples on production machines.
- Use multiple tools to validate findings.
- Share IOCs with threat intelligence platforms (VirusTotal, MISP).
Reverse engineering malware through static and dynamic analysis is essential for understanding threats and developing countermeasures. While static analysis provides quick insights without execution, dynamic analysis reveals real-time behavior. Combining both approaches ensures a comprehensive examination of malware functionality.
Cybersecurity professionals should continuously refine their reverse engineering skills, stay updated on the latest analysis tools, and contribute to the security community by sharing intelligence.
Subscribe to WNE Security’s newsletter for the latest cybersecurity best practices, 0-days, and breaking news. Or learn more about “How to Reverse Engineer Malware Using Static and Dynamic Analysis”